Garden Building Performance

There are many claims for green buildings but how do you know which ones really mean something? As a scientist I look for evidence, particularly in relation to a recognised standard.

We claim that our garden offices, studios and workshops are low energy because we design them to at least achieve the standard of insulation required for new housing as defined in Part L of the Buuilding Regulations. Most clients opt for the Penthouse 100 but some are persuaded by the higher level of comfort and reduced heating costs from adopting the higher Penthouse 150.

specifications

 

Penthouse 150Penthouse 100Bdg regs standards¹Typical Garden Office/Room
ThicknessU value² Wm-²/KThicknessU value² Wm-²/KU value² Wm-²/KThicknessU value² Wm-²/K
Roof insulation153mm0.14128mm0.170.16 – 0.2545mm0.57
Wall insulation128mm0.1778mm0.280.30 – 0.3545mm0.57
Floor insulation100mm0.22100mm0.220.22 – 0.2501.20
Windows/doors-1.15 pane-1.15 pane1.8 – 2.0--
-1.80 frame-1.80 frame--1.90 frame

¹ Building Regulations Part L 2002

² U value calculation: BRE U value calculation version 1.08. Calculation method: BS EN ISO 6946

For larger garden buildings there are several standards worth considering.

http://www.breeam.org/

The Government issued the Code for Sustainable Homes last year which, as the name suggests, relates to housing with Level 3 the minimum required for publicly funded housing and Level 6 the aspirational goal.

http://www.communities.gov.uk/planningandbuilding/buildingregulations/legislation/englandwales/codesustainable/

Finally and, in my view, most relevantly, there is the system being promoted by the Association of Environmentally Conscious Builders (AECB). This is very simple to understand with both a prescriptive and performance based approach and plenty of practical advice on how to use the standards. Essentially Silver should be the minimum to which anyone considers building with the Gold standard somewhat higher in performance than even the German Passivhaus standard.

http://www.carbonlite.org.uk/carbonlite/

Whether you adopt one of these standards as a goal in its own right or use the guidance as a way of improving an existing design, the benefits can be significant. As with all building, incorporating energy saving measures at an early stage in the design is far easier than adaptation or retrofit in the future. And, in most cases, the premium can be as low as 5-15% of the capital cost for a lifetime of savings.

This entry was posted in Green Building, Industry News, Miscellaneous and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>